Despite the anticipation surrounding the Ripple vs.The SEC case, it is crucial to remain patient and trust the legal process. The decision will have a monumental effect on the digital asset space, with Ripple’s ongoing efforts, partnerships, and potential integration into banking systems.
In a new video by Digital Outlook with David, the host discussed the lingering question: why is the Ripple vs. SEC case taking so long to resolve? He highlighted several reasons and gave logical reasoning as to why the case is getting delayed.
Lengthy Legal Proceedings:
He said that over the past two and a half years, a lot of applications and counter-applications have been filed, leading to a complex legal process. Lawsuits involve various factors, such as dispositions, applications, subpoenas, and responses, which can significantly extend the timeline.
Magnitude and impact of the case:
The Ripple vs. The SEC case is very important for the digital asset space. Judge Analisa Torres is aware of the big impact her decision will have. It’s important to consider the history of the Howey test from the 1940s when deciding if a digital asset is a security. Judges take their time to review precedents, write explanations, and aim for strong justifications that can hold up against appeals.
Other Cases on Judge Torres’ Docket:
It’s important to note that the Ripple case is not the only one Judge Torres is presiding over. She also handles criminal cases, which take precedence over civil cases. This further contributes to the length of time it takes for a judgment to be rendered.
It is projected that a decision in the Ripple vs. SEC case could be reached around September 9th, according to legal analyst John Deaton. This estimation aligns with the timeframe typically seen after the judge rules on double motions.